topbanner

ANIMAL LAW

CLIPPINGS &

INTERVIEWS

CREDENTIALS

NEWS

PRESENTATIONS

no text

LINKS

plaquewhite

Ruby

Ruby: Seminal Decision on Veterinary Malpractice Litigation
(Nov. 18, 2008)

Sherman v. Kissinger, (pdf) 146 Wash.App. 855 (Div. I, 2008), pub.: A published decision holding that Washington's medical malpractice statute, chapter 7.70 RCW, does not apply to lawsuits involving allegations of malpractice by veterinarians. Although one might assume that applying a human health statute to veterinarians would be a good thing for animals and their guardians, in fact, the opposite is true. Chapter 7.70 establishes a number of impediments to malpractice suits, including mandatory mediation, a shorter statute of limitations, and the elimination of alternative causes of action, many of which are relied on by animal law practitioners to enhance claims on behalf of animal guardians. Sherman also argued that her dog, Ruby, was a unique individual who was irreplaceable; the only way to even approach adequately compensating Sherman was to give her the special value that she placed on the dog, also known as "intrinsic value." The defendants' position, which was supported by an amicus brief from pet industry organizations including the American Kennel Club, was that Sherman was only entitled to the market value of Ruby, an amount of $100-$200. The court held, importantly, that the question of an animal's value is one for the jury and not, in ordinary circumstances, one to be determined by a judge in a pretrial motion. Lastly, the court confirmed that emotional distress damages are recoverable when a person intentionally causes injury or death to a companion animal.

BillMed
:Home: :Animal Law: :Administrative Law: :Animal Ordinances: :Anti-Harassment: :Bailee Liability: :Bite & Attacks: :Civil Rights: :Creditor-Debtor: :Criminal Law: :Custody: :Disability Law: :Estate Planning: :Landlord-Tenant: :Pet Liens: :Products Liability: :Sales: :Veterinary Malpractice: :Wrongful Death: :Clippings & Interviews: :Clippings & Inter. II: :Credentials: :Special Training/Member: :News: :Blizzard: :BSL: :Clarke: :Harlee: :Max: :Maxine: :Ruby: :Wolverton: :Yofi: :Conventions: :Pet Insurance: :Pet Insurance 2: :Pet Insurance 3: :Pet Insurance 4: :Presentations I: :Presentations II: :Publications: :Legal Guides: :Referrals: :ID State Animal Codes: :WA State Animal Codes: :About Mr. Karp: :Links I: :Links II: :Links III:
creditcardicons_43

DISCLAIMER: By accessing this site,  you agree to hold the law office of Adam P. Karp harmless and assume any risk  that the linked information might be outdated or dead. You are encouraged to  contact the clerk or code reviser of the municipality in which you are searching  for the most current animal laws. The links below will take you to the nearest  general webpage for the requested information. You may need to drill down by  clicking one or more successive hotlinks until you reach the pertinent code  titles and chapters. Key search terms for locating the appropriate code include  “Animal,”  “Cruelty,”  “(Potentially) Dangerous,”  “Nuisance,”  “Kennel,”  and  “Cattery.”

SWEET WILLIAM LA PAZ       (BILL)

Photo of Cady the Labrador,
Courtesy of Grant Hopper

Problems, Concerns, or Questions regarding this Website

Copyright © 2003 - 2013, Adam P. Karp, Esq., All Rights Reserved

THE FOD